Celina City Schools

Facility Planning Committee Meeting #3

April 3, 2019

Thank You for coming!

Agenda for today – April 3, 2019

• Recap February 19th meeting comments

• Review updated Master Plan costs with LFI included for needed academic space

• Eliminate any options?

• Begin to prioritize and rank preferred options

Celina OFCC Equity # History - Reminder

Currently:
	
56% Local
	
44% State

	
	
58%	57%	56%	55%	54%	54%	54%	56%	56

	

355

350

345

340

335

330

325
% 320

315

310

2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019

Master Plan Comments

From February 19, 2019 meeting

OFCC Master Plan Draft A

New PK-4 + new 9-12 + Renovate/Add to CIS for 5-8

PROS:	CONS:

•	Like the idea of 9-12 being separate from 7-8

•	Community may react negatively to tearing down the 1998 high school addition

•	Opportunity missed to have MS and HS together; curriculum and school spirit

•	Multi-story building for elementary especially if this affects primary students

•	OFCC addition size is not large enough to add 2 grades, extra LFI space is needed

•	3 buildings

OFCC Master Plan Draft A2

New PK-4 + Renov/Add/Demo HS for 9-12 + Renovate/Add to CIS for 5-8

PROS:	CONS:

•	Retains the 1998 High School addition	•	OFCC addition size is not large enough to add 2 grades to CIS, extra LFI space is needed

•	3 buildings

•	Performing arts?

OFCC Master Plan Draft C

New PK-3 + new 9-12 + Renovate/Add to CIS for 4-8

PROS:	CONS:

•	none	•	Athletic complex location if new HS is moved to East Elementary location

•	Too much

•	Middle School on west side of town

•	3 buildings

•	Having lower elementary students in a multi-story building

OFCC Master Plan Draft C2

New PK-3+ Renov/Add/Demo HS for 9-12 + Renovate/Add to CIS for 4-8

PROS:	CONS:

•	Retains the 1998 High School addition	•	Athletic complex location if new HS is moved to East Elementary location

•	Too many addition add-ons and renovations. Concerns with the area where additions meet existing and potential leaks

•	Middle School on west side of town

•	Having lower elementary students in a multi-story building

OFCC Master Plan Draft D

New 7-12 + Renovate/Add to CIS for PK-6

PROS:	CONS:

•	Minimal renovation •	Only 2 buildings
•	Less transitions for students

•	Like the High School in East Elementary location

•	Option to build up – 3 story

•	Might be the easiest sell to the community •	7-12 seems to work
•	2 sites, 2 buildings for easier maintenance

•	Option where the new 7-12 is close to the football field

•	Smaller sf than other options

•	No High School mentors for Elementary

•	We cannot go to less buildings if that

means less gym space

OFCC Master Plan Draft D2

Renov/Add/Demo HS for 7-12 + Renovate/Add to CIS for PK-6

PROS:	CONS:

•	Only 2 buildings

•	Less transitions for students

•	Option to build up – 3 story

•	No High School mentors for Elementary

•	We cannot go to less buildings if that

means less gym space

•	7-12 seems to work

•	2 sites, 2 buildings for easier maintenance

OFCC Master Plan Draft E

New PK-3 + Renov/Add/Demo HS for 7-12 + Renovate/Add to CIS for 4-6

PROS:	CONS:

•	None	•	We don’t want to have to pay an extra LFI for extra space at the Elementary

•	3 sites

•	Having lower elementary students in a multi-story building

Recurring Comments and Concerns

•	Performing arts space

•	2 buildings vs. 3 buildings

•	Tearing down 1998 construction

•	2-story vs. 3-story

•	Best bang for the buck

•	Athletics

•	Bussing logistics

•	Simple plan – easy story to tell

PLANNING DISCUSSIONS

March 8, 2019 March 26, 2019

OFCC co-funded area vs. actual needs

UPDATED DRAFT MASTER PLANS

Anticipated 2019 cost adjustment Added needed LFI academic space

OFCC project cost variables

*Important to Remember*

These items will continue to change until the date when OFCC funds the project:

• Enrollment – new projection when project is funded • Equity # (state/local %) – adjusted every September • Construction cost $/sf – adjusted every April

OFCC Master Plan Draft A

• Build new elementary school for PK-4 – 1,068 students, 115,921sf
– 12,139sf LFI space

• Build new high school for 9-12 – 799 students, 128,703sf

• Renovate/Add to Celina Intermediate for 5-8 – 762 students, 26,830sf addition
– 15,336sf LFI space

• Abate and demolish Celina Primary, Celina Elementary, Celina Middle, Celina High and Ed Complex
DRAFT

Estimated State Share $34.7 million

Estimated Local Share $48.0 million

LFI’s

$7.0 million

Estimated Local share with LFI’s
$55.0 million

4/1/2019 update

– not final costs and sizes

OFCC Master Plan Draft A2

• Build new elementary school for PK-4 – 1,068 students, 115,921sf
– 12,139sf LFI space

• Renovate/demo/add to CHS for grades 9-12 – 799 students, 96,541sf addition

• Renovate/Add to Celina Intermediate for 5-8 – 762 students, 26,830sf addition
– 15,336sf LFI space

• Abate and demolish Celina Primary, Celina Elementary, Celina Middle, and Ed Complex

Estimated State Share $33.5 million

Estimated Local Share $46.2 million

LFI’s

$7.0 million

Estimated Local share with LFI’s
$53.2 million

4/1/2019 update

DRAFT – not final costs and sizes

OFCC Master Plan Draft C

• Build new elementary school for PK-3 – 852 students, 95,228sf
– 11,823sf LFI space

• Build new high school for 9-12 – 799 students, 128,703sf

• Renovate/Add to Celina Intermediate for 4-8 – 978 students, 48,317sf addition
– 20,581sf LFI space

• Abate and demolish Celina Primary, Celina Elementary, Celina Middle, Celina High and Ed Complex	DRAFT

Estimated State Share $36.2 million

Estimated Local Share $48.8 million

LFI’s

$8.3 million

Estimated Local share with LFI’s
$57.1

4/1/2019 update

– not final costs and sizes

OFCC Master Plan Draft C2

• Build new elementary school for PK-3 – 852 students, 95,228sf
– 11,823sf LFI space

• Renovate/Demo/Add to CHS for grades 9-12 – 799 students, 96,541sf addition

• Renovate/Add to Celina Intermediate for 4-8

Estimated State Share $34.3 million

Estimated Local Share $47.2 million

LFI’s
$8.3 million

– 978 students, 48,317sf addition

– 20,581sf LFI space

Estimated Local share with LFI’s

• Abate and demolish Celina Primary, Celina Elementary, Celina Middle and Ed Complex

$55.5 million

4/1/2019 update

DRAFT – not final costs and sizes

OFCC Master Plan Draft D

• Build new middle/high school for 7-12 – 182,122sf

• Renovate/Add to Celina Intermediate for PK-6 – 77,419sf addition
– 35,254sf LFI space

• Abate and demolish Celina Primary, Celina Elementary, Celina Middle, Celina High and Ed Complex

Estimated State Share $33.5 million

Estimated Local Share $46.0 million

LFI’s

$8.9 million

Estimated Local share with LFI’s
$54.9 million

4/1/2019 update

DRAFT – not final costs and sizes

OFCC Master Plan Draft D2

• Renovate/Demo/Add to CHS for grades 7-12 – 149,364sf addition

• Renovate/Add to Celina Intermediate for PK-6 – 77,419sf addition
– 35,254sf LFI space

• Abate and demolish Celina Primary, Celina Elementary, Celina Middle, and Ed Complex

Estimated State Share $33.0 million

Estimated Local Share $45.4 million

LFI’s

$9.7 million

Estimated Local share with LFI’s
$55.1 million

4/1/2019 update

DRAFT – not final costs and sizes

OFCC Master Plan Draft E

• Build new elementary school for PK-3

– 95,228sf

Estimated State Share $34.6 million

– 32,607sf LFI space to make this a PK-4	Estimated Local Share

• Partial demolition/additions/renovations to make CHS a 7-12

– 149,364sf

• Renovate Celina Intermediate for 4-6 – District choice to keep this a 5-6

• Abate and demolish Celina Primary, Celina Elementary, Celina Middle, Ed Complex

$47.5 million

LFI’s

$9.0 million

Estimated Local share with LFI’s
$56.5 million

4/1/2019 update

DRAFT – not final costs and sizes

Should any of these options be eliminated? Are there any other options to explore?

OFCC Master Plan Draft D - Segmented Renovate/Add to CIS for PK-6 + New 7-12

SEGMENT 1:	SEGMENT 2:

•	Large addition to CIS while occupied	•

•	Maintain status quo at MS and HS	•

•	CIS addition requires significant LFI for needed academic space	•
•	Abate and Demolish Celina Primary and Elementary upon completion

Construct new 7-12 on East Elem site

Maintain status quo at MS and HS during construction

Demolish MS and HS upon completion

OFCC Master Plan Draft D - Segmented

• Renovate/Add to Celina Intermediate for PK-6 – 77,419sf addition

• Abate and demolish Celina Primary, Celina Elementary

Estimated State Share $14.7 million

Estimated Local Share $18.8 million

LFI’s

$8.9 million

Estimated Local share with LFI’s
$27.7 million

4/1/2019 update

DRAFT – not final costs and sizes

Should
Are there any oth
raft C2
CELINA CITY SCHOOLS Master Plan Options

SUMMARY OF OPTIONS	4/3/2019

2018	2019

Grade
Config.	Enrollment	$$$

OFCC Local $$$	Share

LOCAL SHARE WITH LFI'S

GRO
raft A	$
D New PK-4 + 5-8 at CIS + New HS       UP DISCUSSIO 79,410,381                           $          85,763,212            $       48,027,399        $       55,053,190 Draft A2                                                                                                                                           $          76,424,651                           $          82,538,623            $       46,221,629        $       53,247,420

New PK-4 + 5-8 at CIS + HS renovation/addition/demolition

Draft C                                                                                                                                              $ D New PK-3 + A/R to CIS for 4-8 + New 9-12 any of these $
New PK-3 + A/R to CIS for 4-8 + HS renovation/addition/demolition er o Draft D	$

Renovate/Add to CIS for PK-6 + new 7-12

80,716,646	$

e
78,081,872     be $

to ex 76,067,766	$

87,173,978	$

d
84,328,421e $

82,153,187	$

48,817,428

47,223,916

46,005,785

$	57,092,219

$	55,498,707

$	54,905,785

Draft D2

Renovate/Add to CIS for PK-6 + HS renovation/addition/demolition

Draft E

New PK-3 + CIS Renov for 4-6 + HS renov/add/demo for 7-12

Draft D - SEGMENT Renovate/Add to CIS for PK-6

$	75,063,624

$	78,628,796

$	31,019,147

$	81,068,714

$	84,919,100

$	33,500,679

$	45,398,480

$	47,554,696

$	18,760,380

$	55,097,249

$	56,564,791

$	27,660,380

What is the No New Cost option? Current 1996 levy rolls off in 2019
•	Currently collecting 3 mills

•	OFCC requires ½ mill be collected for maintenance

•	2.5 mills would be available to use towards funding a project unless other sources can provide the equivalent of ½ mill

•	Depending on interest rates a 30 year bond issue would fund a local share of: – $18,000,000 - $19,000,000

•	This represents a co-funded OFCC project in the range of: – $32,000,000 - $34,000,000

General project cost range

Project Local Share	millage	$/year

$10 million $49 million $51 million $53 million $55 million
$57 million

1.7 – 1.9 mills 6.5 – 7.2 mills 6.8 – 7.5 mills 7.0 – 7.8 mills 7.2 – 8.1 mills
7.5 – 8.3 mills

$60-$67 $227-$252 $238-$263 $245-$273 $252-$283
$263-$290

(millage estimates include OFCC ½ mill for maintenance) (millage does not reflect 3.0 millage roll-off from previous bond)
(every $2 million additional adds approx. 0.25 mills

Notes: Assumes all property tax
5.25% interest rate 30-37 year bond term

Cost per year is per $100,000 valuation

General project cost range

Project Local Share	millage after	$/year

	3 mill roll-off	

$49 million $51 million $53 million $55 million
$57 million

3.5 – 4.2 mills 3.8 – 4.5 mills 4.0 – 4.8 mills 4.2 – 5.1 mills
4.5 – 5.3 mills

$122-$147 $133-$158 $140-$168 $147-$178
$158-$185

(millage estimates include OFCC ½ mill for maintenance) (millage does not reflect 3.0 millage roll-off from previous bond)
(every $2 million additional adds approx. 0.25 mills

Notes: Assumes all property tax
5.25% interest rate 30-37 year bond term

Cost per year is per $100,000 valuation

GROUP DISCUSSION

What are your top 2 options and why?

Should any of these options be eliminated? Are there any other options to explore?

INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES ON OPTIONS

Indicate how strongly you support each option

Range of 1 through 9 1 is no support
9 is strongest support

Draft A

is an Option that should be further considered

A. 1 (do not support) B. 2
C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F.	6 G. 7 H. 8
I.	9 (strongly support)

Draft A2

is an Option that should be further considered

A. 1 (do not support) B. 2
C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F.	6 G. 7 H. 8
I.	9 (strongly support)

Draft C

is an Option that should be further considered

A. 1 (do not support) B. 2
C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F.	6 G. 7 H. 8
I.	9 (strongly support)

Draft C2

is an Option that should be further considered

A. 1 (do not support) B. 2
C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F.	6 G. 7 H. 8
I.	9 (strongly support)

Draft D

is an Option that should be further considered

A. 1 (do not support) B. 2
C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F.	6 G. 7 H. 8
I.	9 (strongly support)

Draft D2

is an Option that should be further considered

A. 1 (do not support) B. 2
C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F.	6 G. 7 H. 8
I.	9 (strongly support)

Draft D2 - Segmented

is an Option that should be further considered

A. 1 (do not support) B. 2
C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F.	6 G. 7 H. 8
I.	9 (strongly support)

Draft E

is an Option that should be further considered

A. 1 (do not support) B. 2
C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F.	6 G. 7 H. 8
I.	9 (strongly support)

Looking Ahead

• Next Meeting: May 21st

– Primary School (East) Cafeteria

• March 2020 potential election date – Bond Language: Nov. Dec. 2019
– Project budget finalized: Oct. 2019

– Master Plan decision to OFCC: Summer 2019